tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6366962561146992018.post8808718141722225240..comments2024-03-28T23:38:20.680+10:00Comments on A Galaxy In Flames: Narrative Armies: Macca On TacticaUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6366962561146992018.post-88055941924865690792015-05-07T19:55:10.111+10:002015-05-07T19:55:10.111+10:00I'm glad you like the articles Amy, you're...I'm glad you like the articles Amy, you're dead right about duel fluffy/competitive in the same army. If you want to submit any questions or have an idea for an article, feel free to let me know as well!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07904465965003296427noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6366962561146992018.post-57280475021423410822015-05-06T23:07:11.049+10:002015-05-06T23:07:11.049+10:00Love the tactica articles. Always a great read :)...Love the tactica articles. Always a great read :)<br /><br />As someone who prefers to play fluffy armies over competitive ones I know it can be hard sometimes, especially if you end up against players who's army is the incarnation of the deli counter.<br />It’s easy to write a fluffy army and it’s easy to write a competitive one. What I’ve always found is it’s really hard (unless you play a tactically flexible for like Ultramarines) to write a list that balances competitiveness without sacrificing too much fluff. <br /><br />I think you’ve hit the nail on the head though when you said “suits your idea of the force” since each legion was so incredibly vast every possible combination of tactics had to be represented somewhere (apart from Destroyers in the Salamanders but hey, someone always has to be awkard!)<br />AmyChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12634296033837280356noreply@blogger.com